Sustainability Reporting Is Getting Serious and Your Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Matters More Than Ever

Sustainability reporting has matured rapidly. With the arrival of frameworks like ‘AASB S2 Climate-related Financial Disclosures’, climate disclosure is no longer a glossy communications exercise or an opportunity to posture on sustainability ambitions. These standards are grounded in legislation and carry liabilities for company directors. They require reporting that is technically correct, scientifically robust, evidence-based, and subject to formal assurance. In short, disclosure is moving from the voluntary presentation of select narratives to mandatory disclosure of specified impacts.  

That means your Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory (and the Basis of its Preparation (BoP)) needs to be absolutely water-tight, capable of withstanding scrutiny from regulators, auditors, assurance providers, investors, and boards. This is no longer the space for soft commitments or untested calculations. It’s the space for technical expertise, rigour, and comprehensive, repeatable methodologies, and that is precisely where Perspektiv operates. 

 

The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

The Science Behind the Story 

At the centre of credible climate reporting sits your organisation's Greenhouse Gas (GHG) inventory. This isn’t a spreadsheet exercise or a carbon dashboard; it is a pivotal building block when assessing your climate-related financial disclosures. Your GHG inventory underpins risk assessments and scenario analysis, transition planning, and target-setting. If the inventory is incorrect or incomplete, everything that flows from it is compromised. 

Building a defensible inventory requires careful boundary-setting, high-quality data inputs, appropriate emissions factors, transparent assumptions and clear calculation logic. It also requires specialist expertise because judgment matters. At Perspektiv, we treat GHG inventory development as a technical discipline, not an administrative task. Our team builds inventories that are aligned with recognised standards and designed to withstand audit, assurance and regulatory review. That’s the difference between reporting that feels credible and reporting that actually is. 

Assurance Is Risk Management, Not a Tick-Box 

‘AASB S2 Climate-related Financial Disclosures’ requires that GHG emissions are formally assured. That means your reporting must be anchored in structured evidence and repeatable systems, not a retrospective narrative designed to justify outputs. Many organisations underestimate the discipline required. Weak data governance, undocumented methodologies, or inconsistent factors are quickly exposed, and once confidence is lost, it is difficult to rebuild. 

For our clients, we see preparing for assurance not as a compliance burden, but as risk management. Perspektiv helps organisations prepare for scrutiny by strengthening the technical backbone of their reporting, ensuring methodology, data flows, and calculations support a clean assurance pathway and a confident leadership position. 

Choose Reporting Partners Who Understand the Science 

As sustainability reporting becomes more technical, the capability of the teams supporting it matters more than ever. Design-led PR reports and sustainability storytelling agencies have their place, but they are not a substitute for emissions accounting expertise. 

Before appointing a reporting partner, it’s worth testing whether they truly understand the science, the standards and the legislative context. Ask whether they can construct a robust GHG inventory, explain their methodology, and defend their assumptions under assurance. 

Our team combines deep technical sustainability experience with a clear understanding of regulatory expectations and assurance requirements. We don’t just prepare reports; we build solid reporting foundations that, once clearly established, enable you to take ownership of preparing your own inventories. 

The Direction of Travel Is Clear 

Reporting of GHG emissions is shifting toward greater transparency, stronger governance and higher expectations of technical integrity. Organisations that recognise this early and invest in credible, science-based reporting capability will be better positioned to respond confidently to assurance, support executive and board decision-making, and maintain trust with stakeholders. Those who continue to treat sustainability reporting as a branding exercise will find the gap widening quickly. 

Let’s step confidently into this new phase of reporting, grounded in science, supported by evidence, and aligned to the standards shaping the future. 

Contact Us