Why Sustainable Utilities Will Shape Australia’s Infrastructure Future

Transmission networks, renewable energy hubs, water recycling facilities , and resource recovery plants are rapidly becoming the defining features of Australia’s infrastructure pipeline. These projects are no longer “emerging trends”; they are becoming the backbone of a net-zero and climate-resilient future. 

But an important truth is often overlooked: 

Building more energy and water infrastructure does not automatically mean building sustainable infrastructure.  

The rise of “green” projects has also brought a paradox: communities are increasingly opposing infrastructure designed to deliver clean energy and secure water. The issue isn’t the intent of these projects; it’s the perception that sustainability is being approached too narrowly. 

Our experience across major utilities shows that the strongest outcomes come from holistic sustainability from the outset, environmental, social, economic and governance, not just emissions reduction. This blog explores the trends shaping utilities today and the practical lessons that help project teams reduce risk, strengthen delivery and maintain community trust. 

Energy: Transmission Success Depends on Early, Holistic Sustainability 

Large-scale transmission projects are now critical to balancing renewable generation and stabilising the national grid. These assets are: 

• Strengthening the grid to support more variable renewable energy 

• Moving clean energy between regions during peaks and troughs 

• Making smarter use of hydro and storage to stabilise supply 

But the engineering challenge is inseparable from the sustainability challenge. 

Common risks we see across delivery

• Embodied carbon hotspots (steel, concrete, cabling) identified too late for redesign 

• Vegetation clearing and biodiversity impacts are driving community concern 

• Route decisions are contested due to a perceived lack of social and cultural consideration 

• IS Rating frameworks engaged too late to add strategic value 

Where sustainability positively shifts outcomes

Projects evolve much more smoothly when sustainability influences: 

• Technology and materials selection (not just reporting on them) 

• Route alignment with ecology, cultural heritage, carbon and cost considered together 

• Community engagement framed around genuine options, not fixed proposals 

• Ratings frameworks used to shape strategy, not justify it after the fact 

A grid transition that is technically correct but socially unacceptable cannot succeed. Holistic sustainability is increasingly the bridge between the two.

Water: Climate Risk and Resource Recovery Demand New Thinking 

Water infrastructure is undergoing an equally rapid transformation. Ageing treatment plants built to historical standards are being replaced or upgraded to meet contemporary environmental expectations, climate pressures, and community demand. 

Systems focused on recycling, reuse and resource recovery are now central to: 

• reducing discharge 

• improving water security 

• supporting circular resource flows 

But the shift also introduces technical and sustainability complexity. 

Patterns emerging across recent delivery

• Energy-intensive treatment systems increase embodied and operational carbon 

• Fugitive emissions (N₂O and CH₄) can exceed the climate impact of construction materials 

• Climate risk is influencing equipment specification and operational continuity, not just site placement 

• Communities expect transparency about performance and long-term resilience 

A recent Climate Change Risk Assessment for a major water project highlighted vulnerabilities, including severe storms, heat impacts, flooding, coastal erosion, storm surge, and power disruptions. 

Practical adaptation outcomes now shaping design

• Dual power supply and UPS systems for continuity 

• Hydraulic redesign to safely redirect peak wet-weather flows 

• Coastal inundation allowances in equipment height and access 

• Redundant communications for uninterrupted remote operation 

Again, the lesson is clear: resilience and community confidence follow when sustainability is a design driver, not a post-design report. 

The Cross-Sector Picture: Five Lessons the Utilities Sector Should Carry Forward 

1. The biggest sustainability levers sit before procurement. Once specifications are locked in, both emissions and resilience are largely predetermined. 

2. Environmental, social, economic and governance considerations are inseparable. Projects framed as “environmentally positive” can still lose support if social impacts are not addressed. 

3. The strongest delivery outcomes balance mitigation and adaptation from day one. 

4. Ratings frameworks are most valuable as strategy tools, not validation tools. 

5. Fast projects are not those that skip sustainability, but those that avoid late rework caused by stakeholder pushback or design gaps. 

Sustainable Utilities Infrastructure: Looking Forward

Australia is not just building more utilities; we are building the infrastructure that will shape how communities live, prosper, and adapt over the next 50 years. 

The transition will only succeed if sustainability is holistic, material, and embedded early enough to shape design, decision-making, and engagement. Communities can, and will, push back on projects that deliver clean energy or secure water but fail to meaningfully address social, cultural or economic impacts. 

If the sector continues to share knowledge openly and apply the lessons already emerging from delivery, we will build utilities that perform, endure and earn trust. 

Sustainable infrastructure is no longer just what we build, it’s how, why and for whom we build it. And whether through a recognised ratings framework or specialist advisory support, the intention remains the same: 

Make sustainability the driver of design, not the report that follows it. 

Want to discuss anything contained in this blog? Reach out and start the conversation...

Contact us